Open/Close Menu
Your Rental Housing Solution
Home · Property Management · Latest News : Anti-Landlord Law Hits Snag
Print Friendly

landlord helpA new noise ordinance that allows the city of Rochester, Minnesota to fine landlords instead of tenants has hit a snag. The police don’t think they can enforce it.

The city council of Rochester has given preliminary approval to the measure which allows the police to ticket landlords when tenants cause neighborhood disruptions.

But police are balking at a requirement that the tenant has to be charged with a crime, for instance disorderly conduct, before the landlord can be ticketed.

The police chief  complained that having to investigate a complaint, file charges and prosecute the tenant defeats the purpose of the ordinance, which is to avoid all that hassle and just hold the landlord liable.

The police would prefer to cite the landlord for problems in the neighborhood where evidence for prosecution is difficult to gather, or in situations that don’t lend themselves to “citing a specific individual” — like when individuals are not named in the complaint.

The Rochester measure does not go as far as an ordinance passed in Maryland earlier in the year, which requires landlords to evict offending tenants, and creates a “black-list” of tenants which landlords must use when screening.

Evicting tenants under the Rochester measure would be a challenge to say the least, because there may be no proof that the tenant was responsible for the noise complaint, or otherwise violated the terms of the lease by committing a crime.

If police are forced to check identification and issue tickets at the scene of a neighborhood complaint before they can cite the landlord under this ordinance, they predict that as many as 90% of the claims against landlords would disappear.  The police chief informed the city council that this would be “a shame”, because charging the landlords, even in cases where the individual tenants cannot be identified, is a strong weapon in cracking down on noise complaints.

A final vote on the measure is slated for November.

In a related story, the Saginaw, Michigan city council is considering a new law that would require landlords living outside of a 30-mile radius of the city center to designate a local contact person to act on their behalf. It is not known whether landlords registering an agent will be required to pay additional fees to the city. The council will consider the argument that having landlords at a greater distance than 30 miles increases problems with enforcement of fire and other building codes.

A similar measure was passed in Philadelphia back in May.

See City Targets Out-of-Town Landlords.

American Apartment Owners Association offers discounts on products and services for landlords related to your rental housing investment, including rental forms, tenant debt collection, tenant background checks, insurance and financing. Find out more at

Print Friendly
  • Ken Gargala

    Let’s face it.. as a landlord there are TWO standards.. one for the owner occupied and one for the Landlord… Another perfect example is the rental inspection fees in Dearborn and other cities in Southeastern Michigan. If the inspectors were truely interested in safety of the residents… they would certainly find more violations in a home that is owner occupied that has NOT been inspected in 30 or 40 years than they would in a tenant occupied house that has just been inspected three years ago. Talk about a double standard ! ! ! !

  • Mike Miliktan

    This is crazy. Why don’t we pass laws that city counilmembers and police chiefs are held accountble when ever there is any crime in their town. Really the criminals and law breakers should never be dealt with directly, that is silly, we should go spend our time fining others instead. That will surrrrrely stop the problem. Ughhh!!!

  • R. Carlsen

    Another case of public extortion. This might be analogous to the case where the fox got into the farm yard and killed the chickens. The farmer killed the cows because the fox was gone. We all need to think about the intellectual wherewithall of those we are electing into office. Common sense and Constitutional law are going down the drain.

Copyright © 2004 - 2017 All Rights Reserved.