Open/Close Menu
Your Rental Housing Solution
Open/Close Menu
Your Rental Housing Solution
Your Rental Housing Solution 866.579.2262
Home · Property Management · Landlord Quick Tips : Why taking recourse against a nonpaying tenant can sometimes get a landlord into trouble
Print Friendly

Q: I own rental property in California. My tenant broke a two-year lease within two months of signing. He left the house without paying the rent. I called a real estate agent, advertised the property and got it rented. Can you advise me if I can deduct the amount I paid for the real estate agent from the security deposit and the loss of rent?

A: What you need is an attorney to help you with your question. Most municipalities and states (including California) have rules pertaining to security deposits and leases. Due to your tenant’s bad behavior, you may be able to legally keep the entire security deposit or just a part of it.

You should first review the fine print of your lease. What does the lease document say happens to the security deposit in case of a default by the tenant? Then, you have to look at your state laws and local ordinances to figure out if any law or ordinance applies to your situation. Once you get a handle on what the lease, laws and ordinances say, you can make a decision on what you can do.

From a lease perspective only, most leases say that a landlord is entitled to recover his or her damages when a tenant breaks a lease. Those damages can include the amount of rent that was unpaid and remained unpaid while you searched for a replacement tenant and may include commissions and other costs you expended to get that other tenant. Most lease documents would allow a landlord to deduct those costs from the security deposit.

But this is where it gets tricky. Some state laws only allow certain items to be deducted from security deposits, and some municipal ordinances require you to provide receipts and proof that you spend money — and only for certain items — before you can deduct those sums from the security deposit. Finally, some ordinances will penalize you, the landlord, if you fail to comply with the statutes and ordinances even when the tenant was at fault.

So if you fail to comply with the laws and ordinances, it could cost you a pretty penny. For these reasons and depending on the amount of money involved, we think you should connect with a local attorney who is knowledgeable about all applicable laws.

You might be able to research and get more information on your own, but you’ll be taking a risk that if you do it wrong, the tenant may have a claim against you. In some places, you might have to sue the tenant to get some of the damages you are entitled to, so make sure you understand what your lease says and what laws apply to you and your situation.

Good luck.

Source: washingtonpost.com

Print Friendly
  • Popsie1947

    My advice is and always will be, never sue, get them out of your life and move on. Your chances of financial recovery that exceeds your cost is such that you have a better chance of seeing GOD than seeing even a break even position

  • Smeado

    I know where you’re coming from but if us landlords don’t start making it possible to identify these scumbags before we accidentally rent to them, then we’re only going to create more of them. You need to get a judgment even if it costs you a little.

  • obamabites

    It cost nothing to put a deadbeat into “collections” and at least sink their credit with a chance to even collect something.

  • Neil

    Yes…I concur, Smeado. It’s our responsibility to keep calling it out, otherwise, these takers will spread the word about how easy it is to swindle

  • Neil

    Quite right Obamabites, I sued a tenant who didn’t even have the courtesy to show up to the courtroom so I won the Judgment…..about ten years later, he calls me to settle because he’s trying to buy a house and he cannot until all judgments are clear

Copyright © 2004 - 2017 AAOA.com. All Rights Reserved.